| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| Documents Found: 351 |
| Title |
Forum |
Year |
Prem Singh vs Dharam Singh
[LexDoc Id : 534976]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Manmohan Krishan Gupta vs Pawan Jaral
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118, 138 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Presumptions as to negotiable instruments-Whether, cognizance of complaint under Section 138 of Act has been rightly taken and process against petitioner has been rightly issued. Held, procedu [LexDoc Id : 534716]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
Sanjeev Jain vs Rajni Dhingra and Ors.
Recovery of loan-Order XXXVVI of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. Leave to defend-Whether, suit for recovery of principal amount of Rs. 3 crores and Rs. 84 lakhs as the interest component can be decreed against defendant. Held, suit [LexDoc Id : 534899]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Ashok Kumar vs Subhesh Kumar
Dishonour of cheque-Section 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Rate of interest-Whether, suit righty decreed against the appellant/defendant for recovery total amount of loans granted by respondent/plaintiff. Held, Trial court was [LexDoc Id : 534898]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Parvesh Jain vs IDBI Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 534897]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Surendra Prasad vs State of Bihar and Ors.
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118, 138, 139 and 143 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Sections 263 to 265, 326 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Procedure of trial-Whether, petitioner has been rightly held guilty for commission of offence punishable under Section 138 of Act. Held, from bare perusal of Section 143 [LexDoc Id : 534896]
|
HC (Patna) |
2018 |
Jafar Ahamad Khan vs State of Uttar Pradesh and Ors.
Power of magistrate-Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. Taking possession of secured assets-Whether, Trial Court has rightly in exercise of powers under section 14 of Act has directed that possession be taken. Held, from entire body of the wr [LexDoc Id : 534443]
|
HC (Allahabad) |
2018 |
Indiabulls Housing Finance Ltd. vs Vaibhav Jhawar and Ors.
Interpretation of statue-Literal rule-In process of interpreting a statute or a provision, it should also be kept in mind that it is the duty of the Court to conceive and perceive the true [LexDoc Id : 534676]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Amit Goel vs Rahul Batheja
Dishonour of cheque-Section 80 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Rate of interest-Whether, Trial Court has righty decreed suit filed by respondent/plaintiff alongwith interest @ 9% per annum on account of respondent/plaintiff having [LexDoc Id : 534675]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
ICICI Bank Ltd. vs Amit Sharma
[LexDoc Id : 534674]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Abdul Majid Mir vs Ghulam Mohi-ud-Din Mir
[LexDoc Id : 534160]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
Bashir Ahmad Teli vs Haleema
Dishonour of cheque-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Sections 242, 342 of Code of Criminal procedure, 1973. Examination of accused-Whether, conviction of petitioner for offence under section 138 of Act, justified. Held, Courts below has appreciated evidence on record. Concurrent f [LexDoc Id : 534159]
|
HC (Jammu and Kashmir) |
2018 |
K. Nithynanada Shetty vs Vijaya Bhaskara Shetty B.
[LexDoc Id : 534158]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Sanjay Mittal vs Sunil Jain
Recovery of money-Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. Contract against public policy-Whether, Trial Court was justified in allowing only partial claim of Appellant. Held, Trial Court has erred in holding that cheque of Rs. 3,00,000/- s [LexDoc Id : 534171]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Digvijay Chandra vs Ambrish Vijay Rohal
[LexDoc Id : 533862]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Saravjeet Malhotra vs LIC Housing Finance Ltd.
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118, 138 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Discharge of legally enforceable debt-Whether, Petitioner has been rightly convicted under Section 138 of Act. Held, from evidence led by respondent, it was evidently clear that it was in [LexDoc Id : 534170]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Sucha Singh vs Inderjit Kaur
Arbitration proceedings barred criminal proceedings-Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Dishonour of cheque-Whether, respondent was rightly acquitted of charge under Section 138 of Act. Held, there cannot be any bar to proceed under Section 138 of Act if arb [LexDoc Id : 534169]
|
HC (Punjab and Haryana) |
2018 |
Vinod Enterprises vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.
Compounding of offence-Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Dishonour of cheque-Whether, conviction of petitioner under section 138 of Act was justified. Held, parties have settled their dispute amicably inter se them. Entire amou [LexDoc Id : 533860]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
Delhi State Co-op. Bank Ltd. vs Syed Mohd. Ahmad
Fraud by bank-Clearing of cheques-Whether, signatures on cheques were or were not of respondent/plaintiff. Held, in order to prove cause of action that signatures of account holder on [LexDoc Id : 533861]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Tuff Drilling (P) Ltd. vs Punjab National Bank and Ors.
Power of DRAT-Direction to deposit of money-Whether, DRAT could have while deciding issues framed by it for its consideration direct deposit of Rs. 40 crores by petitioner with Registrar New Del [LexDoc Id : 533930]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
M. Shobha vs M.N. Sareyu
Appeal against acquittal-Sections 138 and 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Presumption in favour of complainant-Whether, acquittal of respondent for offence under section 138 of Act was justified. Held, from the evidence of PW-1 and the materials placed by her, [LexDoc Id : 533929]
|
HC (Karnataka) |
2018 |
Adesh Tyagi vs Pooja Tyagi
[LexDoc Id : 533928]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
Mukesh Kumar Sharma vs Girish Chander
Reliance on copy of legal notice-Section 65 of the Evidence Act, 1872. Admissibility of secondary evidence-Whether, Trial Court erred in relying of copy of legal notice. Held, Section 65 of Act provides that secondary evidence of a document is admissible wh [LexDoc Id : 533927]
|
HC (Delhi) |
2018 |
T.P. Musthafa vs Malappuram District Co-op. Bank Ltd. and Ors.
[LexDoc Id : 533661]
|
HC (Kerala) |
2018 |
Lochan vs Rajinder Kumar
Dishonour of cheque-Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. Presumption as to negotiable instruments-Whether, conviction of petitioner under section 138 of Act was justified. Held, cheque in question was issued by petitioner in favour of respondent to [LexDoc Id : 533660]
|
HC (Himachal Pradesh) |
2018 |
| |
| First | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | Next | Last |
| |
